Global map of irrigated areas

It’s not easy to find a good cartographic representation of the global irrigated land, therefore I made my own map using data from Meier et al. (2018).

The raw resolution of the above product is 30 arcsec, i.e. 1 pixel covers about 1 km by 1 km at equator. Here, I aim to represent the entire world in a single picture of say 1000 pixels wide, which means that 1 pixel would span about 40 km of land at the equator. Therefore I need to aggregate the original data to a lower resolution. Many people don’t realize that cartographic software like QGIS or ArcGIS will do this resampling under the hood with a default anti-aliasing method that may not work well with the data to represent, as shown below:

I like to aggregate data with hexagon grids because hexagons are the most circular-shaped polygon that can tessellate to form an evenly spaced grid. Thanks to the MMQGIS plugin it’s easy to generate a shapefile of continuous hexagons covering the Meier et al. layer. Here I worked in the Equal Earth projection because it retains the relative size of areas. Hence I first resampled the Meier et al. layer to Equal Earth at 800 m resolution using the nearest neighbor method. Then, I used the zonal statistics tool in QGIS to compute the « count » of irrigated pixels in every hexagon. Finally I computed the percentage of irrigated area by hexagon using the $area function in the field calculator available from the attribute table menu (percent irrigated = 100*800*800* « _count » / $area).

 

Using the same method we can aggregate the data by country.

Countries with the highest percentage of irrigated land:

  • Bangladesh (38%)
  • India (28%)
  • Pakistan (22%)

Countries with the largest irrigated area:

  • India (876’000 km²)
  • China (746’000 km²)
  • USA (287’000 km²)
Higher resolution version (download). Feel free to use the map under the license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-NC-3.0).

Reference: Meier, J., Zabel, F., and Mauser, W.: A global approach to estimate irrigated areas – a comparison between different data and statistics, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1119–1133, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1119-2018, 2018.

Plus d'actualités

The missing link to valorize CESBIO’s applicative research works

=>  My colleagues at CESBIO are extremely creative! Over the past ten years, they have developed a wide range of new products and methods for extracting information from Copernicus data. They don’t just develop and validate the method on a few sites; they continue their work until they have produced data for the whole of […]

Le chaînon manquant dans la valorisation des travaux de recherche en télédétection

=> Mes collègues du CESBIO sont très créatifs ! Ils ont mis au point, au cours des dix dernières années, un grand nombre de nouveaux produits et de méthodes d’extraction de l’information à partir des données Copernicus. Et bien souvent, ils ne s’arrêtent pas à la mise au point de la méthode et à sa […]

Sentinel-2 overtakes Landsat in scientific litterature

The OpenAlex is a new but already very convenient open database to survey scientific litterature. For a coming blog post on CNES Datacampus site, I studied the proportion of papers using only one of the Sentinel-2 or Landsat missions, and papers using both of them, in 2025. And what stroke me is that Sentinel-2 just […]

Rechercher